To LEED or not to LEED

We at D2E have been fans of the Forbes Loft project for a while now, so it was great to see this article in the Globe today by Erin Ailworth. Besides outlining all of the innovative features that will help Forbes be a great example of sustainable living, the article also bring up an interesting point about the LEED certification. Though this certification was created to avoid greenwashing and to help consumers identify a real green building from one that just markets itself to be one, Forbes is not going to seek LEED certification. They have decided that they would rather put that money and time into the building and let it speak for itself. Like any new venture in life, there are kinks to be worked out and it seems that LEED has some growing up to do.

"This is, in part, why LEED even exists today," Hicks said. "If you look back in the early '90s, there were all these buildings being built that were saying they were green and all they had were photovoltaics on the roof. And that's not a green building. Green buildings are more comprehensive than that." - Tom Hicks quoted in the Globe article

On the other hand...

Galinsky said the Forbes Park team is "not anti-LEED," but he doesn't believe the project needs the certification. The LEED process can be "slow, confusing, and frustrating," he said, adding costs to a project's bottom line. Galinsky said he would rather use that money on conservation and renewable-energy efforts.

Take a look at this article on Grist.org by Auden Schendler.

We're concerned that LEED has become costly, slow, brutal, confusing, and unwieldy, a death march for applicants administered by a soviet-style bureaucracy that makes green building more difficult than it needs to be, yet has everyone genuflecting at the door to prove their credentials. The result: mediocre "green" buildings where certification, not environmental responsibility, is the primary goal; a few super-high-level eco-structures built by ultra-motivated (and wealthy) owners that stand like the Taj Mahal as beacons of impossibility; an explosion of LEED-accredited architects and engineers chasing lots of money but designing few buildings; and a discouraged cadre of professionals who want to build green, but can't afford to certify their buildings. A growing number of LEED veterans have, or soon will, throw in the towel. LEED is broken. This article explores what went wrong, and begins a discussion of how to fix it.

We are not architects here at D2E. We are critical consumers trying to navigate this gray zone - looking for ways that we can live a more sustainable life. So the complications with LEED certification just make it harder for us. We'd like to think that if a building is deserving of a LEED stamp of approval, it would be easy to aquire. It is unfortunate that this is not the case and this is more reason for us to host D2E. We research each exhibitor and they have to pass our criteria before we allow them to participate. We do the homework for other critical consumers that are busy with their families and jobs, as they should be.